site stats

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

Splet21. feb. 2011 · The application was dependent upon the finding at that stage that electricity could not be stolen and that electricity had the physical properties contemplated in S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) which held that electricity could not be stolen. Splet2.1.2 Sedition S v Mayekiso 1988 (4) SA 738 (A) 2.1.3 Public Violence S v Le Roux 2010 (2) SACR 11 (SCA) 2.2 CRIMES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE General Reading: Snyman: 325-349. Burchell: Chapters 83-86. Bill of Rights Compendium at 2A -33. 2.2.1 Defeating or Obstructing the Course of Justice S v Binta 1993 (2) SACR 553 (C) S v ...

(PDF) CASES AND MATERIALS ON CRIMINAL LAW SECOND …

Splet29. mar. 2024 · This article's main goal is to examine and identify weaknesses in our legal system, South African criminal law, and how it should be applied to crimes involving theft … Splet08. nov. 2024 · S V MINTOOR 1996 1 SACR 514 This is a case that demonstrates the South African courts’ unwillingness to expand the common law relating to theft of incorporeal … rubric for peer editing https://jcjacksonconsulting.com

Non-pathological criminal incapacity relating to provocation or ...

SpletBill of Rights Compendium at 2A -33. 2.2.1 Defeating or Obstructing the Course of Justice S v Binta 1993 (2) SACR 553 (C) S v Bazzard 1992 (1) SACR 302 (NC) S v Cassimjee 1989 … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECGHC/2016/49.pdf SpletCompare S v Raphatle 1995 (2) SACR 452 (T); S v Manyonoyo 1996 (11) BCLR 1463 (E); S v Lewies 1998 (1) SACR 101 (C) at 104a-c. [12] In S v Maluleke (2) SACR 577 (T) at 582e-h Webster J stated as follows: “[12] The consequences of failing to comply with the provisions of s 303 have not, from the limited research I could undertake ... scandinavian kitchen london restaurant

South African Cases Archive Centre for Child Law

Category:S v S - Dullah Omar Institute

Tags:S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

Protecting dignity under common law and the Constitution: The ...

http://www.saflii.austlii.edu.au/za/cases/ZASCA/toc-B.html SpletIn S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SA SACR 514 (C), a magistrate had found the accused guilty of the theft of 901 units of electricity from the Bredasdorp Municipality. On review, the Court set the conviction aside on the basis that electricity could not be regarded as a thing which could form the subject of a charge of theft at common law.

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

Did you know?

SpletHowever in the case of R v Mavros 166 the court held that property also includes rights that others have in that property.167 The Court stated in S v Mtetwa 168 that “in regard to the crime 162 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C). 163 See in general Snyman Criminal Law (2002) 535 et seq. All the South African cases deal with some form of corporeal property. SpletThe accused's lawyer referred to the case of S v Mintoor and argued, inter alia, that the charges of theft of electricity should be quashed because "electricity was not capable of theft". 23 The State argued that the court should develop the common law and rule that theft of electricity was an offence at common law.

SpletProperty - things capable of being stolen: i) Movable ii) Corporeal not: design or idea R v Cheeseborough 1948 (3) SA 756 (T) Board and lodging - R v Renaud 1922 CPD 322 Electricity / energy S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C). [Electricity Act 41 of 1987 creates offence] Computer software programme through copying Splet01. jan. 2006 · Disclosure. The authors confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed.

SpletS v Ndebele 2012 1 SACR 245 (GSJ) The question whether or not electricity can be stolen was answered in the affirmative in the above trial matter which culminated in convictions of two of three accused. 1 The broad facts The accused were variously arraigned on two racketeering-related charges of SpletS v Ngobeza and another 1992 (1) SACR 610 (T) S v Swiegelaar 1979 (2) SA 238 (C) S v Tau 1996 (2) SACR 97 (T) S v Van den Berg 1991(1) SACR 104 (T) S v Visagie 1991 (1) SA …

Splettrias politica (vide S v Augustine 1986 (3) SA 294 (C) at 3021-J; S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) at 517a-b; S v Malgas 2001 (2) SA 1222 (SCA) at 1226D; S v De Vicenzo 2003 (3) SA 572 (C) at 578C). The judgment was binding on mag istrates' courts countrywide between attorney. In addition, attorneys talk to

SpletTABLE OF CASES SOUTH AFRICA R v Abbass 1916 AD 233 R v Abelson 1933 TPD 277 S v Abrahams 1997 (2) SACR 47 (C) S v Adams 1959 (1) SA 646 (P) S v Adriantos 1965 (3) SA 436 (A) S v Aimes 1998 (1) SACR 343 (C) R v Anthony 1938 TPD 602 S v AR Wholesalers 1975 (1) SA 551 (NC) R v Baartman and Others 1960 (3) SA 535 (A) S v Baloyi 1978 (3) … scandinavian kit homesSplet01. maj 2012 · In S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) it was held that electricity is an energy and is incapable of theft. The three accused in the Ndebele case faced a large number of … rubric for podcast assignmentSpletversteekte item suksevol sou kon steel”- Stafford J (as he then was) in S v Tau 1996 SACR 97 (T) at 102 h-i.” [11] The magistrate also failed to consider a decision of this division S v Mekula 2012 (2) SACR 521ECG wherein the thin line … rubric for peer evaluation of group projectSplettrias politica (vide S v Augustine 1986 (3) SA 294 (C) at 3021-J; S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) at 517a-b; S v Malgas 2001 (2) SA 1222 (SCA) at 1226D; S v De Vicenzo 2003 (3) … rubric for peer editing checklistSpletIn S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 517 (C), in which the court had to decide whether electricity can be stolen, Farlamj stated at 517a-b: 'Dit is dus onnodig om die gemene reg op die onderhawige punt uit te brei. In die algemeen gesproke, is dit in elk gevaljuridies ongesond om the trefwydte van ons strafreg deur Hofbeslissings te vergroot. rubric for performance task assessmentSpletSACR 514 (C), which held that electricity could not be stolen. You are the presiding officer in the matter. After hearing all the evidence the only remaining question that arises is … scandinavian kitchen shelvesSpletS v Van den Berg 1996 (1) SACR 19 (N). S v Zoko 1983 (1) SA 871 (N) at 875C. Secretary for Inland Revenue v Cadac Engineering 1965 (2) SA (A) Solicitor-General v Malgas 1918 AD 489. V and T v UK (Application No. 24888/94, 4 December 1998). Venter v S (SCA case no 381/97 of 7 Sept 1999). scandinavian kit homes uk